Secondly, over half (51%) of our respondents said that regulators relevant to their industries understood what their business needs, while only 16% disagreed. Whether the respondents were founders of larger businesses or smaller ones didn't make a great difference to their answers either. However, our survey did reveal that older businesses, as defined by those aged five years and over, are more likely (57%) to believe regulators know what they need compared to younger ones (44%), as defined by those aged under three years old. This may very well be pointing to a learning curve - younger firms are less likely to have a direct engagement with regulatory bodies while older ones get accustomed to them. Younger firms may also be more entrepreneurial by their nature, bringing new products or business models to market, which don't necessarily align to existing regulatory structures.
Regulators are responsible for creating an environment of fair competition, where no firm is discriminated against and all are given the chance to succeed. For that reason, maintaining a relationship based on mutual understanding between regulatory bodies and businesses is crucial in creating a competitive market which works for consumers. High levels of understanding are only beneficial for both sides of that relationship.
Lastly, we asked entrepreneurs whether they thought universities had a good understanding of their needs. We found that 40% of entrepreneurs believed they did, against 26% who thought they did not. Among owners of larger businesses, the sentiment towards universities was more positive (49%) than compared to entrepreneurs running smaller firms (31%). This may simply be driven by the differences in skills needed in larger firms and SMEs.