Family Matters Issue 4: August 2021 News A v A (arbitration: guidance) [2021] EWHC 1889 (Fam) – Procedure to follow when seeking to confirm or to challenge arbitral award. The parties had reached a significant degree of agreement between them as to the terms of a financial settlement, but a number of issues remained, which they decided to resolve through arbitration. News AS v CS (Private FDR) [2021] EWFC 34 – party cannot unilaterally pull out of private financial dispute resolution The parties were engaged in financial remedy proceedings. A date for a private financial dispute resolution (FDR) appointment was fixed in October 2020. News CA v DR (Schedule 1 Children Act 1989: Pension Claim) [2021] EWFC 21 – Schedule 1 award not extended to make pension provision for caring parent The parties had a four-year old child, for whom the applicant made an application for financial provision under Schedule 1. News Inquiry into the rights of cohabiting partners With over 3.4 million couples cohabiting in England and Wales, cohabiting partners have, in recent years, been the fastest growing family type in England and Wales. News LM v DM (Costs Ruling) [2021] EWFC 28 – costs order reduced for failure to negotiate The wife had sought orders for maintenance pending suit (MPS) and a costs allowance, by way of a Legal Services Payment Order (LSPO). News FC v MC & DC (a minor) [2021] EWHC 154 (Fam) – court makes lives with order in favour of former same-sex partner of child's mother The applicant and respondent had been in a same sex relationship, during which time they had arranged to have a child using donor sperm. News AZ v FM [2021] EWFC 2 - Order for child maintenance can be capitalised A final order was made in relation to the parties' financial claims in 2011. That order included an order for periodical payments by way of child maintenance in relation to the parties' daughter, who, by the time the matter returned to court, was 19. Subscribe Never miss a publication by signing up to our mailing list Subscribe Family Matters: Subscribe Family Matters Issues Issue 8 Oct 2023 Issue 7 Mar 2023 Issue 6 Sep 2022 Issue 5 Feb 2022 Issue 4 Aug 2021 Issue 3 Feb 2021 Issue 2 Sep 2020 Issue 1 Jan 2020 Share
News A v A (arbitration: guidance) [2021] EWHC 1889 (Fam) – Procedure to follow when seeking to confirm or to challenge arbitral award. The parties had reached a significant degree of agreement between them as to the terms of a financial settlement, but a number of issues remained, which they decided to resolve through arbitration.
News AS v CS (Private FDR) [2021] EWFC 34 – party cannot unilaterally pull out of private financial dispute resolution The parties were engaged in financial remedy proceedings. A date for a private financial dispute resolution (FDR) appointment was fixed in October 2020.
News CA v DR (Schedule 1 Children Act 1989: Pension Claim) [2021] EWFC 21 – Schedule 1 award not extended to make pension provision for caring parent The parties had a four-year old child, for whom the applicant made an application for financial provision under Schedule 1.
News Inquiry into the rights of cohabiting partners With over 3.4 million couples cohabiting in England and Wales, cohabiting partners have, in recent years, been the fastest growing family type in England and Wales.
News LM v DM (Costs Ruling) [2021] EWFC 28 – costs order reduced for failure to negotiate The wife had sought orders for maintenance pending suit (MPS) and a costs allowance, by way of a Legal Services Payment Order (LSPO).
News FC v MC & DC (a minor) [2021] EWHC 154 (Fam) – court makes lives with order in favour of former same-sex partner of child's mother The applicant and respondent had been in a same sex relationship, during which time they had arranged to have a child using donor sperm.
News AZ v FM [2021] EWFC 2 - Order for child maintenance can be capitalised A final order was made in relation to the parties' financial claims in 2011. That order included an order for periodical payments by way of child maintenance in relation to the parties' daughter, who, by the time the matter returned to court, was 19.